trplay
Zen MBB Master
Well are you sure about this? Here's what Marko says on his web site. Just saying!Nevertheless, you were second overall and on the podium. He could have mentioned that intruser ;-)
Well are you sure about this? Here's what Marko says on his web site. Just saying!Nevertheless, you were second overall and on the podium. He could have mentioned that intruser ;-)
Would those be Keto donuts? When are you going to get around to weighing that Vendetta?
...and here are the Cd*A estimates (and the input parameters) using R. Chung's cool online tool.
The Ninja V18 adapters and/or the Quiver tailbox must have helped me out.
Surprised my rig slipped through the air a little better than Jason's custom carbon covered frame.
This table is based on Strava speed and power for the fastest 18 mile lap, and my estimates of the rider/bike weights.
Kevin's wheels got damaged in transport, so he rented a set. Maybe they account for his higher Cd*A.
View attachment 3773
Quite impressive Jim....and here are the Cd*A estimates (and the input parameters) using R. Chung's cool online tool.
The Ninja V18 adapters and/or the Quiver tailbox must have helped me out.
Surprised my rig slipped through the air a little better than Jason's custom carbon covered frame.
This table is based on Strava speed and power for the fastest 18 mile lap, and my estimates of the rider/bike weights.
Kevin's wheels got damaged in transport, so he rented a set. Maybe they account for his higher Cd*A.
Quite impressive Jim.
This is so very close to my results and speeds with my testing at my local track earlier this year:
I took the speed and wattage data from several different runs and ran them through Chung's model, after processing the .fit file into the CVS file needed for Chung method, this is what I came up with:
V20 @ 150 watts = CdA= 0.154, avg speed = 38.66 kph = 24.02
V20 @ 203 watts = CdA= 0.160, avg speed = 42.8 kph = 26.6 mph
V20 @ 288 watts = CdA= 0.163, avg speed = 48.5 kph = 30.14
Speeds are probably faster because of the constant track elevation and me and the bike weighing in at about 170 lbs.
I think your tail-box has a BIG aero benefit!...and here are the Cd*A estimates (and the input parameters) using R. Chung's cool online tool.
The Ninja V18 adapters and/or the Quiver tailbox must have helped me out.
Surprised my rig slipped through the air a little better than Jason's custom carbon covered frame.
This table is based on Strava speed and power for the fastest 18 mile lap, and my estimates of the rider/bike weights.
Kevin's wheels got damaged in transport, so he rented a set. Maybe they account for his higher Cd*A.
View attachment 3773
I think your tail-box has a BIG aero benefit!
Larry have you done any tests with & without you tailbox?
How many inches did the Ninja V18 drop the height of the top of your shoulders from the ground?
What is the height of the top of the shoulders above the ground of Jason and Kevin?
What is the front/rear wheel loading with/without the V8 adaptors?The V18 adapters drop my head and shoulders about 3 3/4 inches (9.5 cm). Some time when I have a low-wind day and time off work, I will do proper Cd*A testing on a 9-mile loop near my house to better quantify what the tailbox does, and what the V18 adapters do.
No, I have not done any test with my little tailbox.Larry have you done any tests with & without you tailbox?
DittoThe V18 adapters look awesome.
Sign me up for a pair, please.
Why?
My Sofrider V1 with the 18 degree seat on it is faster than
my Vendetta, on the flat road.
Aero is king.
Why not just run a smaller diameter rear wheel?If those "Ninja V-18 adapters" make it to production, you can count on me buying a set! I'd love to drop my backrest angle like that!
Why not just run a smaller diameter rear wheel?
Not to mention, the smaller wheels look funny.Because the whole reason for running 700c wheels is to take advantage of the superior rolling resistance of larger diameter wheels.