I've been meaning to do this for awhile. With Calvin's Challenge (a 12-hour race in Ohio) coming up in one week, I figured I better get around to it. I used R. Chung's method and his cool app as a poor man's wind tunnel. You need a power meter, a circular course where you don't have to touch your brakes, and some Excel spreadsheet skills to do this. The more windless the day, the better. The real enemy of accurate results isn't the wind, but the variability of the wind. I didn't have a perfect day for testing, with variable winds of 6 to 11 mph, but it could have been worse. Also, my power meter has been reading high lately, so the Cd*A values might be higher than otherwise, but what is important is the comparison from trial-to-trial on the same day. Here is the data I collected and I'll discuss the results below:
In Trial A I was wearing a helmet with a large rain/sun visor attached. In Trial B, I switched to a standard Bell helmet without a visor. In Trial C, I switched to the Giro Air Attack helmet with the visor up, and in Trial D, I moved the visor down over my glasses.
This is the Giro Air Attack helmet, with a megnetic visor.
What I concluded is that the Air Attack helmet is no better and no worse aerodynamically than a standard helmet when the visor is up. But whe the visor is down, as in the photo, I averaged about a 0.01 improvment in Cd*A. That's very good.
Now if you are curious about the the other results, read on. What does "frame taped" mean? Well, I was talking with Gary Christopher at Bike Sebring in February. With his temporariliy lame foot, he couldn't race, so he must have had extra time time to stare at the Vendetta. He says, "hey Jim, why don't you guys enclose the space under the seat where the seatstay and chainstay tubes run? It'd clean up the airflow even more and give some low storage space." That thought has been banging around in my head since then, so today I very crudely closed off that space with packing tape.
This is what it looked like. Then I took it out on the course for Cd*A testing.
I calculated an average improvment of 0.007 in the Cd*A. Considering how crudely this was done, that's pretty good.
The other variable that I accidentlly tested: forgetting to zip the top on the tail bag. To take the above photo, I pulled my cell phone out of the bag and didn't zip the bag back up until I though all my testing runs were over. Then I saw the bag was unzipped, zipped it up, and did one more run with it zipped. I calculate that forgetting to zip the bag cost 0.009 Cd*A.
So here are the final results. I am ascribing the variability in the results to be due to wind variability and the relatively short (1.5 mile course) course I was using.
I don't claim that they are statistically significant, but they followed very closely to what I expected. It's enough for me to wear the Air Attack helmet with the visor down next week.
Jim
In Trial A I was wearing a helmet with a large rain/sun visor attached. In Trial B, I switched to a standard Bell helmet without a visor. In Trial C, I switched to the Giro Air Attack helmet with the visor up, and in Trial D, I moved the visor down over my glasses.
This is the Giro Air Attack helmet, with a megnetic visor.
What I concluded is that the Air Attack helmet is no better and no worse aerodynamically than a standard helmet when the visor is up. But whe the visor is down, as in the photo, I averaged about a 0.01 improvment in Cd*A. That's very good.
Now if you are curious about the the other results, read on. What does "frame taped" mean? Well, I was talking with Gary Christopher at Bike Sebring in February. With his temporariliy lame foot, he couldn't race, so he must have had extra time time to stare at the Vendetta. He says, "hey Jim, why don't you guys enclose the space under the seat where the seatstay and chainstay tubes run? It'd clean up the airflow even more and give some low storage space." That thought has been banging around in my head since then, so today I very crudely closed off that space with packing tape.
This is what it looked like. Then I took it out on the course for Cd*A testing.
I calculated an average improvment of 0.007 in the Cd*A. Considering how crudely this was done, that's pretty good.
The other variable that I accidentlly tested: forgetting to zip the top on the tail bag. To take the above photo, I pulled my cell phone out of the bag and didn't zip the bag back up until I though all my testing runs were over. Then I saw the bag was unzipped, zipped it up, and did one more run with it zipped. I calculate that forgetting to zip the bag cost 0.009 Cd*A.
So here are the final results. I am ascribing the variability in the results to be due to wind variability and the relatively short (1.5 mile course) course I was using.
I don't claim that they are statistically significant, but they followed very closely to what I expected. It's enough for me to wear the Air Attack helmet with the visor down next week.
Jim