four bar suspension for the MBB front?

Henri

scatter brain
I am dreaming of custom MBBs. (only because Cruzbike does not offer every kind of bike ;) ) I would benefit from front suspension, though and that is tricky on an MBB. When the suspension moves, the bottom bracket should stay in sync with the seat and the chain length should not change.

Flevobike have done it with a trailing swing arm, but that free floating boom that has to bear all the forces might get a bit heavy? Also the movement path of the wheel probably changes trail a lot. (And when adjusting the position of the bottom bracket, you change either the chain length or the trail, depending on if the swing arm moves with the bottom bracket.) Swing arm bearing is not in the middle of the swing arm but next to the chain line. To minimise talk between drive and suspension.

There arew contraptions that work similarly.

And there are crazy over engineered solutions that probably weigh a lot and destroy the beautiful drive train efficiency.

Cruzbike did it with a telescopic fork in the past or it was at least possible to do. Seems like little movement and crosstalk, but I think you can not just go and get a custom telescopic fork and I do not want soma hacked adapter to get a drive on it.

And then I came across four bar linkage forks and the crazy stuff you can do with them!
...and strictly speaking you do not even have to put (all of) it inside the fork...
https://de.pinterest.com/pin/1196337401657902/

Four bar linkages can achieve some wild movements and I am searching for a setup that can achieve a good movement path for the wheel whith minimal movement of the bottom bracket and no change in chain length (Axle and BB on the same bar, I guess, but one idler might be acceptable). Questions will be if pedaling torque will create an additional input to the pushing of the leg on the pedal and the chain pulling between bottom bracket and axle (rather outsite points of chein ring and cog!).
I have found this rudimentary online tool (sorry, it is in German) http://www.tm-aktuell.de/TM5/ViergelenkAnimation/viergelenkanimation.html
and with just a little bit of fooling around came up with this mechanism (one shows the bottom bracket as the output, one the wheel; dimensions in centimeters for a 20" wheel and somewhat long legs; can not link to a configuration, you need to put in the values manually, if you want to modify them). I am sure with a more usable tool, some training and more work and trying completely different arrangements, great improvements are still to be made!
Does somebody know a good tool (not expensive and easy to learn) or can and want to help? Also sturdyness and weight as well as manufacturability are of course important questions.

1762295520082.png1762295532093.png

(By the way: Who noticed that my weird keyboard does not have a working apostrophy? ;) )
 

Henri

scatter brain
Oh right, and have Cruzbike ever followed an idea like this? If yes, what are the problems that kept it from becoming a product? Or is there maybe a project still going or is it an interesting new idea? :)
Should I tag @Robert Holler, @Jim Parker ond/or someone else? (Well, already done it, don't I? :D )
 

danhunt56

Member
Cool ideas. The early Quest had a suspension mounted on the Crown of the fork, it did not work out as my later model doesn’t have it. The purpose you want out of suspension? Comfort? Less bouncing of the front wheel on road imperfections? I thought of a suspension system for the seat to deal with the former, but a Thor seat upholstered with 3/4” memory foam and a 3mm Ventisit and a bit of rider skill solved the comfort problem. Other then the engineering challenge it seems simplicity is a more elegant route and probably why Cruzbike has no front suspension on the the Q45. I would like to see you build it though.
 

Henri

scatter brain
The purpose you want out of suspension? Comfort?
One is gonne be a longtail cargo bike. Rear suspension for would be highly approved for certain cargo and maybe a passenger, but it won't do much for the rider. Wheels will be 20" and it shall not fear badly lowerer curbs, potholes and sole rought cobbles (old irregular baby heads). It's supposed to be the bike for all roads in all conditions.
The other shall get highest offroad capability. It will get fat tires (actual fat bike tires, not "fat for a road bike" or such), but from my current fat racumbent (Velomotion Sequoia) I know the result of soft suspension with no damping. Maybe here a rear suspension could bring some damping to the front, but if it works, I want it! :D A maximized bike.
For the folding bike I want to use a rear swing arm and the MBB for folding in thirds. Maybe a collapsible front suspension can be used to minimize packed measurements.
Also on bumps without suspension you can more easily lose traction for drive and steering. When riding in all weather conditions, roads can be a bit slippery sometimes.

I thought of a suspension system for the seat
There were suggestions in the German Velomobilforum as well. Disadvantages: Moves body in relation to bottom bracket; feet still shake and I often ride flat pedals; lots of unsuspended mass -> not the best suspension performance probably (only important where the bumps may break traction?)
 

Robert Holler

Administrator
Staff member
Cool pictures and concepts - but all I see from a product management/manufacturing/maintenance view is pure complication and unnecessary elements and high weight - the exact opposite of what makes for a good bicycle (recumbent or otherwise.) Also - most of those front fork suspension ideas I have seen and used over the years - and they did not work - for myriads of reasons. Hence why they were never adopted in any real way en masse on uprights or any other bikes. ‍
 

Robert Holler

Administrator
Staff member
Oh right, and have Cruzbike ever followed an idea like this? If yes, what are the problems that kept it from becoming a product? Or is there maybe a project still going or is it an interesting new idea? :)
Should I tag @Robert Holler, @Jim Parker ond/or someone else? (Well, already done it, don't I? :D )

1. Yes.
2. Complications and cost for design and manufacturing.
3. You never know we are always up to something.....
 
Top