RojoRacing
Donut Powered Wise-guy
Most anyone can eventually ride a CB. Almost no one can ride them well. The problem is you have to balance power from both legs for the entire 360's on both legs at all times. When you don't, you have to counter the pressure of your powerful leg, with the less powerful upper body. In real life, this bike is like wrestling a very powerful reptile.... snake alligator your choose. After 2,000 mile and 1 year, I decided to try a non front wheel drive recumbent. It was a revelation and epiphany to how much fun a bent can be when you are not constantly fighting your legs. CB says you can make more power by incorporating your upper body. The TRUTH is you have to incorporate your upper body and that becomes very tiring... even after your in great shape. That is just the way it is. It is a flawed design... IMHO. UNLESS you are able to spin equally with both legs, your legs will always over power your arms and upper body. I have ridden with and behind many CB riders. Everyone of them fight the bike the entire time. I sold my CB at a loss, as fast as i could... and love my Bacchetta. The only way I would take a CB is if you gave it to me. Then I would sell it cheap! Yes I could rides hands off, supposedly the test to see if you are good enough. I guess the CB might be for some people, but the bike I found was dangerous. IF you are not paying attention, you can steer yourself real fast into a heap of trouble!!! Personally, i can not see how they are still in business.
Read more
rojoracing531 day ago
That was my opinion for the first weeks and 500 miles I had mine and again through my first 24hour time trial at the world championships where I rode another 500 miles in just a day. If I had returned the bike to them after that trial period I would probably be writing a very similar comment to yours but I did return the bike and I worked at mastering it. The problem was I was so time crunched to get up to speed in my trial period before the race I had no time to refine the basics so I continually fought the bike. Now I'm so damn comfortable on it it's my bike of choice unless I want to ride in a group and need people to keep up with me to have fun. I've had DF riders draft off me for 10-20 miles at a time and after they realize I'm so much smoother then what they had imagined a bent to be they are comfortable only inches off my rear tire and we can hold a nice conversation while they draft me. I can't ride no handed but I have to admit I've never taken the time to practice, I know a few people who can do it so effortlessly that it's sickening.
Read more
David Falgout11 hours ago
@rojoracing53 I understand your point of view. And..what is more important that we ride! That said, I have a question. Have you spent any time on a top shelf Bacchetta CA2.0 or Carbent? THAT IS set up correctly?
Read more
rojoracing535 hours ago
@David Falgout Nope only in and around an aid station one time after I finished a double century and then drove out like 5 hours later to the last aid station wondering where my other friend was who just happened to be on a CA2.0. Of course, I was super wobbly on it as I would have expected nothing less from a quick spin. I was only chiming in because you seemed to have had such a poor experience that you blame the bike. I just wanted to share that I too swore the design was shit until I figured it out then it was great. As I told the Parkers before they sent me the bike, "I can ride anything on two wheels". I'm sure I could have just as much fun on a whole array or other types of bikes and bents as well. I only wish there were more bent riders willing to race down the mountains with me regardless of the type.
Read more
David Falgout10 minutes ago
@rojoracing53 Yes more riders of bents would be great! Its not a "shit" design. To be more accurate it is a novel deign. Not in the main-stay for sure. Yes there are a few that can ride them and think they are great. I like you can ride anything with 2 wheels. I also raced motorcycles of all kinds. I also flew high performance aerobatic home built aircraft. I was quite good at it as well. One could say that I, ...like you... relate to machines. I rode the Silvio for a year. At the same time I had a Bacchetta Corsa. I did not like the aluminum frame corsa because the ride was very harsh. It was fast, but uncomfortable. The silvio CB was about as fast. Me, with my engineering background decided to really look at all of the ins and outs of both types. SO I will say now ( again what I found). A Moving bottom Bracket FWD Cruisebike requires more wattage and calories to cover miles vs a NON MBBFWD ( CA2.0). THE CB by its very design will involve the upper body and legs. The harder you push the more upper body is needed. If you spin vs push/ mash the pedals not as much upper body is needed. I experienced this and I have followed very accomplished CB riders that this was very evident. I prefer all my puny, weak human energy directed to pedals.... and pedals only. If some one else does not want this ( you) God bess and good luck. SO...in conclusion... you did not ride the Bacchetta much. I would appreciate it that in the future before you make statements that you qualify them. If you would have said I have many miles on both platforms like me, you point of view IMHO would be worth more. At this point you have a preference, however narrow minded and misinformed it may or may not be. In addition I used to follow all the top Bent riding racers. They could buy and ride any bike. FEW VERY FEW chose CB. The reason is the learned what I did..... by the school of hard knocks. Money and time lost. They were much more successful on anything but a CB. PEACE OUT!
Read more
rojoracing531 day ago
That was my opinion for the first weeks and 500 miles I had mine and again through my first 24hour time trial at the world championships where I rode another 500 miles in just a day. If I had returned the bike to them after that trial period I would probably be writing a very similar comment to yours but I did return the bike and I worked at mastering it. The problem was I was so time crunched to get up to speed in my trial period before the race I had no time to refine the basics so I continually fought the bike. Now I'm so damn comfortable on it it's my bike of choice unless I want to ride in a group and need people to keep up with me to have fun. I've had DF riders draft off me for 10-20 miles at a time and after they realize I'm so much smoother then what they had imagined a bent to be they are comfortable only inches off my rear tire and we can hold a nice conversation while they draft me. I can't ride no handed but I have to admit I've never taken the time to practice, I know a few people who can do it so effortlessly that it's sickening.
Read more
David Falgout11 hours ago
@rojoracing53 I understand your point of view. And..what is more important that we ride! That said, I have a question. Have you spent any time on a top shelf Bacchetta CA2.0 or Carbent? THAT IS set up correctly?
Read more
rojoracing535 hours ago
@David Falgout Nope only in and around an aid station one time after I finished a double century and then drove out like 5 hours later to the last aid station wondering where my other friend was who just happened to be on a CA2.0. Of course, I was super wobbly on it as I would have expected nothing less from a quick spin. I was only chiming in because you seemed to have had such a poor experience that you blame the bike. I just wanted to share that I too swore the design was shit until I figured it out then it was great. As I told the Parkers before they sent me the bike, "I can ride anything on two wheels". I'm sure I could have just as much fun on a whole array or other types of bikes and bents as well. I only wish there were more bent riders willing to race down the mountains with me regardless of the type.
Read more
David Falgout10 minutes ago
@rojoracing53 Yes more riders of bents would be great! Its not a "shit" design. To be more accurate it is a novel deign. Not in the main-stay for sure. Yes there are a few that can ride them and think they are great. I like you can ride anything with 2 wheels. I also raced motorcycles of all kinds. I also flew high performance aerobatic home built aircraft. I was quite good at it as well. One could say that I, ...like you... relate to machines. I rode the Silvio for a year. At the same time I had a Bacchetta Corsa. I did not like the aluminum frame corsa because the ride was very harsh. It was fast, but uncomfortable. The silvio CB was about as fast. Me, with my engineering background decided to really look at all of the ins and outs of both types. SO I will say now ( again what I found). A Moving bottom Bracket FWD Cruisebike requires more wattage and calories to cover miles vs a NON MBBFWD ( CA2.0). THE CB by its very design will involve the upper body and legs. The harder you push the more upper body is needed. If you spin vs push/ mash the pedals not as much upper body is needed. I experienced this and I have followed very accomplished CB riders that this was very evident. I prefer all my puny, weak human energy directed to pedals.... and pedals only. If some one else does not want this ( you) God bess and good luck. SO...in conclusion... you did not ride the Bacchetta much. I would appreciate it that in the future before you make statements that you qualify them. If you would have said I have many miles on both platforms like me, you point of view IMHO would be worth more. At this point you have a preference, however narrow minded and misinformed it may or may not be. In addition I used to follow all the top Bent riding racers. They could buy and ride any bike. FEW VERY FEW chose CB. The reason is the learned what I did..... by the school of hard knocks. Money and time lost. They were much more successful on anything but a CB. PEACE OUT!