Gromit
Guru
Conventional bike wisdom (diamond-frame) seems to says that luggage should be kept as low as possible.
Does this advice apply to the Cruzbike? Discuss?
Why am I asking this question? I went with the conventional advice that low is better on my Sofrider and mounted a pannier rack on my rear swinging arm. I bought a pair of panniers and a rack top bag as well.
I mainly ride my Cruzbike for pleasure rather than commuting to work. I rarely use the panniers as my day ride kit fits easily into the top bag. Recently I started to think about reducing the weight of the bike by getting rid of the rack and hanging a bag off the seat instead.
I therefore had a look back through some earlier forum threads and found an interesting one about seatback-mounted, Fastback Double Century and Radical Design Solo Aero bags.
In the middle of the thread, I found these words:-
Hotdog said
The discussion then moved back onto the specifics of how to mount the Double Century bags and the discussion on C of G got dropped.
IMHO It is interesting topic. What do you other folks think? Higher or Lower?
Does this advice apply to the Cruzbike? Discuss?
Why am I asking this question? I went with the conventional advice that low is better on my Sofrider and mounted a pannier rack on my rear swinging arm. I bought a pair of panniers and a rack top bag as well.
I mainly ride my Cruzbike for pleasure rather than commuting to work. I rarely use the panniers as my day ride kit fits easily into the top bag. Recently I started to think about reducing the weight of the bike by getting rid of the rack and hanging a bag off the seat instead.
I therefore had a look back through some earlier forum threads and found an interesting one about seatback-mounted, Fastback Double Century and Radical Design Solo Aero bags.
In the middle of the thread, I found these words:-
Hotdog said
John Tolhurst repliedQuote: It probably would be better if the bag were slightly higher, it would look at bit neater if it didn't bend round under the seat base and would be marginally more aerodynamic (though lifting the load C of G higher is less good).
Hotdog repliedQuote: Its a small effect - but I would suggest more good. The relatively high C of G on the cruz compared to low racers is important to its ridability, as it gives you more time for your balancing reactions and so allows them to be timed with the pedal stroke. Sometimes the timing is not there, and you have to manhandle the bike to react when you want it.
Quote: Very true, moving less than 5kg by less than 10cm isn't going to make much difference to anything, and in any case lower centre of gravity isn't necessarily better. As you said, too low (like a low racer) and balance gets twitchy.
The discussion then moved back onto the specifics of how to mount the Double Century bags and the discussion on C of G got dropped.
IMHO It is interesting topic. What do you other folks think? Higher or Lower?