MrSteve
Zen MBB Master
I've read the standard logic, the, "Cool Aid" behind the MBB.
Specifically, the theory behind the idea that the climbing
prowess of the front-wheel drive MBB Cruzbike is partially
attributable to the extra input from the handlebars.
I think that's true enough, as far as that goes, but not the whole story.
My musings along this line of thought?
On a Cruzbike, the body replaces -or is a substitute for-
the frame that connects the bottom bracket to the rest of the bicycle on a
mainstream (non-MBB) bicycle.
So, with no frame to absorb flex, all pedal power is delivered to
the pavement.
This can be demonstrated by an experienced Cruzbike rider.
When the rider concentrates on maintaining a consistently
straight course, compensating for any pedal forces with appropriate
inputs from both the steering leg(s) and the handlebar, the
bicycle is much more efficient than when the rider allows the
bicycle to oscillate in time with the pedals.
So to sum up, my point is that, without a frame to absorb -and lose-
pedal-induced flex, the MBB can be more efficient.
On the other hand, until the legs learn to steer, it's more work...
since the rider is also doing the job that a frame normally does.
Yes?
No?
Maybe?
-Steve
Specifically, the theory behind the idea that the climbing
prowess of the front-wheel drive MBB Cruzbike is partially
attributable to the extra input from the handlebars.
I think that's true enough, as far as that goes, but not the whole story.
My musings along this line of thought?
On a Cruzbike, the body replaces -or is a substitute for-
the frame that connects the bottom bracket to the rest of the bicycle on a
mainstream (non-MBB) bicycle.
So, with no frame to absorb flex, all pedal power is delivered to
the pavement.
This can be demonstrated by an experienced Cruzbike rider.
When the rider concentrates on maintaining a consistently
straight course, compensating for any pedal forces with appropriate
inputs from both the steering leg(s) and the handlebar, the
bicycle is much more efficient than when the rider allows the
bicycle to oscillate in time with the pedals.
So to sum up, my point is that, without a frame to absorb -and lose-
pedal-induced flex, the MBB can be more efficient.
On the other hand, until the legs learn to steer, it's more work...
since the rider is also doing the job that a frame normally does.
Yes?
No?
Maybe?
-Steve