My tests (using two head angle prototypes - straight and negative so far) suggest that using a really strong anti-flop is a great boon both off and ON the bike.
Due to combination of conventional wheel flop, and 'flop into turn' and 'flop into lean' that are many orders of magnitude stronger than on conventional bikes (due to weight distribution of steered parts - entire transmission plus your legs) most problems of MBB riders stem exactly from that.
Using steering angle closer to 90 deg solves two kinds of flop, but not flop into lean (which is actually useful in a way, but not when TOO strong. Making boom very short can solve it, too - but will introduce unbearable tiller length).
Return to center spring of calibrated strength is actually better than steering damping so far as control over the bars is concerned (and easier to implement), and is critically important - 'trail' is, basically, that spring, and riding bikes very little or no trail (or, worse yet, negative trail) is hard unless your CG is very far from steering axis (slow steering on LWB) - but on FWD bikes your CG MUST be close to steering axis or you'll get wheel spin due to rearward weight bias (like Rohorn's Flowroller).
Do read Patterson's work on
'control spring', it is very enlightening, though he did not address MBB bikes with their quirks in particular (though he recommended about 10 cm of trail for best control if using conventional steering angles in personal communication. In case of 90 deg, 5-6 cm is quite enough for absolute stability at any speed).