Sofrider v2/k with Rohloff

kling

Active Member
Hi all,

A fresh build by a friend. (wish it was mine), Sofrider v2/k with a Rohloff Speedhub and a Topeak Super Tourist DX rack. Had a quick test ride, very nicely fitted together, would be a sweet touring bike.

IMG_1893.jpg height: 444px;
IMG_1894.jpg


Extra holes had to be drilled for the mudguard mount, note not to try under the front axle as this interferes with the hub.

cheers
Kendrick
 

KenM

Member
Ahh!  Yes!
Both my chain and


Ahh! Yes!
Both my chain and derailleur have had it. I've also long felt the need for greater range so I've been looking enviously at the Rholoff. Can I justify the cost?! I'd probably go for the disk brake version as well. Another option is the SRAM DualDrive like on the new Quest. That would be cheaper, but the thought of no derailleurs is so appealing!
 

ak-tux

Zen MBB Master
Shimano Alfine or SRAM

Shimano Alfine or SRAM iMotion would be equivalent to the Rohloff Speedhub but cheaper.
 

KenM

Member
Unfortunately neither the

Unfortunately neither the Shimano Alfine or SRAM iMotion have anything like the range of the Rholoff.
 

John Tolhurst

Zen MBB Master
The new shimano 11 speed

The new shimano 11 speed system - shifts are constant percentage increases, 17-18% per ratio, total range is 409%, compared with the 526% Rohloff.

In my view 409% is enough, I'd take the smooth shimano over the costly noisy heavy clunky rolhoff. Rolhoff - great hub, just not up to date any more, in my opinion. Exceptions - loaded touring - maybe.
 

p_clancy

New Member
Response to Queries

Hey, that's my bike! Kendrick said he was going to post a photo, but I hadn't come across it until now.

Firstly, thanks to ak-tux for the compliment. On the weekend I turned the handlebar stem around to face towards me, which allows the handlebars to be lowered significantly because they now sit behind my knees. I think it looks a lot better just for doing that, and it certainly helps with blood circulation to the hands.

I have no idea how much it weighs, but I'll try to remember to put it on the scales some time. It doesn't really matter to me, because after riding for only a couple of weeks I am already overtaking most people on the uphills and I now actually look forward to a stiff headwind.

In relation to the Rohloff, this isn't my first bike fitted with one - I have been riding a Logo trike with a Rohloff for seven years, so I know what they are worth. If you want to get one brand new for a very reasonable price, go to www.starbike.com. Yes, the Alfine 11 is still a lot cheaper, but there are still a few advantages to the Rohloff: firstly the range is wider, and on a route with ups and downs I can use the entire range; secondly the shifting is within the hub and not the lever, so there is less trouble adjusting the cables; thirdly the shifting is not sprung, so that if you lose cable tension you remain in the same gear and don't end up at one end of the range; finally, they've been around for a while now and the reliability is well tested. And don't believe Jon when he says it's noisy and clunky - it's only noisy in seventh gear and I don't know what he means by 'clunky'. The Cruzbike conversion kit has long dropouts, so it's good to go for the OEM axle plate - the only problem is that the brake-boss mounted cable guides are slightly misaligned because of the offset front axle (you can see this at the top right of the lower photo). It has not seriously impacted on smooth shifting, but I am waiting to see how quickly the cables wear.
 

John Tolhurst

Zen MBB Master
"And don't believe John when

"And don't believe John when he says it's noisy and clunky - it's only noisy in seventh gear and I don't know what he means by 'clunky'. "

Hmm, it seems you havn't ridden the Shimano? They have redefined what a good hub feels like to ride, according to my trusted sources. ;)
 

p_clancy

New Member
More Responses

Firstly, apologies to John for misspelling your name. You're right that I haven't ridden the Shimano, but the main reason for that is that I am perfectly happy with the performance of the Rohloff. Let's not get into a big "apple vs ibm" argument about this - I'm not prepared to die defending the Rohloff and I'm perfectly prepared to accept that it does have some disadvantages. I just don't believe that the disadvantages are that major.

Secondly, in response to the query from ak-tux, I put my bike on the bathroom scales last night and it comes in at a whopping 19.5 kg. This includes the Topeak rear rack, SKS full length mudguards and entry-level Suntour suspension forks. Plus the bell and mirror if you want to be really picky.

Finally, for KenM, I wouldn't get the Rohloff disc version unless you have the brake bosses where you need them.
 

kling

Active Member
Hi Patrick,
Welcome to the


Hi Patrick,
Welcome to the forums. Thanks for weighing your bike for ak-tux. I think the Rohloff is a thing of Germanic beauty (akin to a fine Swiss watch).

John, maybe we can cycle with Patrick one day, then you can check out the Rohloff invivo...
Although, you'd have to ride your Quest to make it more equal... ;)

Kendrick
 

ak-tux

Zen MBB Master
Thanks for weighing the bike

Thanks for weighing the bike at my request. Well, I was just curious. Anyway as you said, the weight does not matter if you are climbing well and passing other riders up the hill! Looks like a very reliable commuter bike.
 
Top