floridabike
Active Member
I recently install a SRAM Dual Dive internal hub on the Cruzbike to compare with Sturmey Archer CSRF3 that I had been using. Both are 3 speed internal hubs with freewheel cassettes. The SRAM comes with it's shifter that utilizes both the hub and cassette shifter on the right handle bar. I have tested both internal hubs with good results using a standard 3 speed shifter so it's not necessary to use the SRAM shifter. Both the 8 or 9 speed cassette shifters work with either the SRAM or sturmey Archer cassettes.
The SRAM shifts faster and better under load but tends to be a little noisier. Has what sounds like a small chain jingle while pedaling and the usual clicking while coasting. After coasting, the Sturmey Archer seems to require about a 1/2 turn of the crank before it engages, something that I didn't like but got used to. If there is a difference in efficiency, it's not apparent.
I prefer the shifting mechanism of the Sturmey Archer with the pull rod and chain vs. the fragileness of the Dual Drive 'Click Box'. The Sturmey Archer's pull rod and chain doesn't protrude far from the exterior of the hub and fairly well protected. where as the 'Click Box' is fragile and unprotected. I think some protection cover is sold separately.
The SRAM uses a 2.66 mm pull rod diameter necked down to 1.94 mm which makes it very fragile. The Sturmey Archer's uses a 4 mm pull rod and well protected. When I tried to purchase a spare pull rod for the SRAM, I found everybody out of stock or back ordered. Must be a big demand for the rods or they are not being produced any more.
The SRAM dual drive sells for about $400 and the Sturmey Archer CSRF3 can be purchased for $75, significantly less. If cost is no concern and if caution is used to protect the click box, the SRAM is probably the better hub but the Sturmey Archer is certainly acceptable and will do the job.
Phil
The SRAM shifts faster and better under load but tends to be a little noisier. Has what sounds like a small chain jingle while pedaling and the usual clicking while coasting. After coasting, the Sturmey Archer seems to require about a 1/2 turn of the crank before it engages, something that I didn't like but got used to. If there is a difference in efficiency, it's not apparent.
I prefer the shifting mechanism of the Sturmey Archer with the pull rod and chain vs. the fragileness of the Dual Drive 'Click Box'. The Sturmey Archer's pull rod and chain doesn't protrude far from the exterior of the hub and fairly well protected. where as the 'Click Box' is fragile and unprotected. I think some protection cover is sold separately.
The SRAM uses a 2.66 mm pull rod diameter necked down to 1.94 mm which makes it very fragile. The Sturmey Archer's uses a 4 mm pull rod and well protected. When I tried to purchase a spare pull rod for the SRAM, I found everybody out of stock or back ordered. Must be a big demand for the rods or they are not being produced any more.
The SRAM dual drive sells for about $400 and the Sturmey Archer CSRF3 can be purchased for $75, significantly less. If cost is no concern and if caution is used to protect the click box, the SRAM is probably the better hub but the Sturmey Archer is certainly acceptable and will do the job.
Phil