Hi All,
I’m currently building up a T50 frameset I recently purchased. The build is going well, waiting on a few parts for a 2x11 drive configuration. I’ve been watching what YouTube videos I can find regarding T50 bike fitting, including those provided by Cruzbike. What I’m looking for is optimal seat position in reference to the bike fore/aft weight distribution. The videos posted on YouTube only show the earlier version of the T50 with the fixed seat mount, which places the seat far forward. The latest version of the T50 has an adjustable seat rail which allows the seat to be placed from near rear to near forward distance between the front and rear wheels, allowing seat placement in a location preferred by most recumbents (which favors 60/40 rear/front distribution). Now for my question. Since the T50 is front wheel drive, is the preferred wheel to wheel weight distribution opposite rear wheel drive recumbents or the same?
All the,
Angel
I’m currently building up a T50 frameset I recently purchased. The build is going well, waiting on a few parts for a 2x11 drive configuration. I’ve been watching what YouTube videos I can find regarding T50 bike fitting, including those provided by Cruzbike. What I’m looking for is optimal seat position in reference to the bike fore/aft weight distribution. The videos posted on YouTube only show the earlier version of the T50 with the fixed seat mount, which places the seat far forward. The latest version of the T50 has an adjustable seat rail which allows the seat to be placed from near rear to near forward distance between the front and rear wheels, allowing seat placement in a location preferred by most recumbents (which favors 60/40 rear/front distribution). Now for my question. Since the T50 is front wheel drive, is the preferred wheel to wheel weight distribution opposite rear wheel drive recumbents or the same?
All the,
Angel