Xrad-T50
New Member
NCC-1701. Nice to see that was noticed."I'm giving her all she's got, Captain! She cannae take any more."
NCC-1701. Nice to see that was noticed."I'm giving her all she's got, Captain! She cannae take any more."
Well, between that tail number and the radioactive symbol, I figured that was your warp drive.NCC-1701. Nice to see that was noticed.
They don't have as much drop in original use, so they don't provide as much reach on a recumbent. My elbows are more angled now. Also the need for something to keep my hands from slipping, so I don't need to gripp harder is bigger. Also they are a bit wide for ultimate aero (there are chinese carbon clones with more sizes). But the angle (flare) is more comfortable and I can use normal flat bar stuff like dedicated brake levers and shifting (same as I use on my other bikes) or grips. I now use grips with small barends too rest my hands on. Also there is some additional real estate for mounting stuff.How are you liking the new corner bars?
I'm really wanting a hard tailbox on the back of my V20. Does the M5 fit with no modifications or would it require drilling? I like the one on the yellow V20 in this thread.Cruzbike is missing a trick in comparison to its European counterpart the Dutch company M5 in that it doesn't make large capacity aerodynamic tailboxes that can directly fit to standard bikes with the original seats. M5 make an 88 litre tailbox that can fit to the Shockproof and now a 57 litre bag that can fit to both it and the Carbon high racer. These tailboxes can be used for commuting and touring. Thor make a 35 litre tailbox that can be fitted to a Thor seat that has bee fitted to Vedettas and German company Proceda Gmbh make large capacity tailboxes but they fit to their seats. This is too much hassle, I think a Cruzbike made or licenced series of tail boxes that directly fit to its bikes with no modification would open up a significant capability to Cruzbikes range.
Why I like these tailboxes is that they not only have a large capacity but they actually reduce drag coefficient on the bikes. So you actually go faster with the tailboxes than without. Cruzbike promote the S40 and the Q45 and T50 as commuter options with pannier racks. This is a good option as I am a big fan of pannier racks over backpacks for commuting. I currently commute on a Giant Quick-E ebike with a pannier rack bag and used to use an Ortlieb messenger bag with a Diamond frame bike, the pannier bag being far more comfortable.
On a upright bike one of the advantages of a pannier rack is that you can get into the drops or use clip on aerobars so the drag can be offset by your body position, this is important with ebikes because you are cruising at higher speed.But this is not the case with recumbents, pannier bags increase drag. Why I think there is an opportunity is that a commuter configuration with say a V20C or other recumbent with a lower drag than the original bike can compete with not just other upright recumbents but also ebikes. According to M5 an upright bike will do 32 kilometres per hour at 250 Watts and 35 kilometres per hour in the drops, 37 km/h for a time trial bike and the Carbon High Racer will do 43 km/h and 48 km/h with a tailbox. I have seen videos of a Carbon High Racer cruising at around 40 km/h without a tailbox .
If you think about the potential advantage a recumbent starts with a lower drag coefficient to an upright but as soon as you fit any storage capacity to an upright its drag coefficient goes up but the suety of aerodynamic tailboxes is that not only does a recumbent start with a lower drag coefficient but you add between 57 and 88 litres of storage and the drag coefficient goes down so the difference if even greater I commute on an ebike and that is about the speed I cruise at my ebike is limited to 45 km/h or 28 miles per hour and I cruise at around 40 km/h in good weather . This means that if that same Carbon High Racer had a tailbox at the same power output it would do around 43-44 kilometres per hour. The M5 Shockproof with an 88 litre tailbox only requires 175 Watts to sit at 40 km/h. That means that a recumbent fitted with an aerodynamic tailbox is going to be faster than any non assisted bike. On my ebike I am pretty much faster than any other bike out there.
This would be true of a Vendetta as well. Now a Vendetta is not cheap but neither are a lot of ebikes, especially fast pedelecs with a 28 mile per hour limiter. A Scott E-Silence is around the same price as a Vendetta.
The huge advantage of a recumbent over an upright ebike is that you have essentially unlimited range that can be also used in touring and don't have to deal with the issue of electronics or batteries which have to be replaced and are really expensive. I just feel that the current configurations that Cruzbike have compete well with non assisted bikes but getting them faster will enable them to compete more with ebikes
I had to notch out some room for the headrest. Then I drilled several holes to mount the box to the seat, using double-sided sticky foam tape to reduce vibration, and fender washers to spread out the forces.I'm really wanting a hard tailbox on the back of my V20. Does the M5 fit with no modifications or would it require drilling? I like the one on the yellow V20 in this thread.
It requires mods but I’ve made it work with the stock seat copying Larry’s approach and also adding an aluminum support bar underneath.I'm really wanting a hard tailbox on the back of my V20. Does the M5 fit with no modifications or would it require drilling? I like the one on the yellow V20 in this thread.
not quite. There has even been a report of one in your corner of the world. They had trouble with fitting the box over the too wide seat struts, though, and noted the noise.....You are bot the first to want a tailbox for Cruzbikes.
Wow!! What kind of volume do you have? Weight limit? How's it riding? Would love to see/hear more.View attachment 14828
Quite a few things to be done still, before I can do real test rides. It might wobble a bit / wag it's tail, when I shake in the front. I hope, the headset is loose, but the seat might be flexing. If so maybe I can get some sideways stiffening for it.
It's a seat and box from German manufacturer Toxy, originally for their lowracer Toxy ZR. Produced by Proceda/Novosport. By chance it fit the contournof the frame quite nice (size L). The little mounting wings in the front got a axtra set of holes for the screws and the custom rear mount is inserted where the headrest would go. Arved said, he wuold be willing to make more of the custom mounting, if interest exists. (Again: He's in northern German.) I am going to post the price and pictures of the mount in a preliminary report soonish, I hope.
(Wheels are the gravel sixspoke from Nextie, Handlebar is Corner Bar from Surly.)
Eating on the bike requires access to the food while riding (obviously). When I'm riding without side panniers, I keep the food in the Moose Pack under the seat and refill that when I stop. For me the Moose Pack is very easy to access with one hand while riding.Also, did you eat on the bike at PBP, and if so, where did you keep the food? That's also nice with the Banana Racers, it's easy to pull out food on the go.
Another thing is that if I put a box behind my head, I'll need to figure out what to do with hydration, because I currently ride with two bottles behind the neck rest. I suppose a hydration bladder inside the tailbox would be the way to go?
I have been thinking of something similar but haven't gotten around to it. Similar in shape and size to the M5 57L tailbox, but a 2 piece that fits snugly to each side of the frame by velcro because I don't feel comfortable drilling any holes in the frame and haven't found any other type of connectors that are durable enough that won't damage it. I mocked one up out of black vinyl and I believe it would look pretty good in CF.I'm going to work on one (perhaps 3x larger that comes all the way down the bottom edge of the seat and wll probalby cover the top half of the back wheel - hoping to have it ready for the Sweden N-S ride in July
On the M5 CHR, the 57l tailbox sits snugly on the frame and is connected only with velcro. Taking it off just takes a few seconds. Making something like this custom fit to the V20 might work in a similar way, but designing a carbon fibre box from scratch would be advanced (certainly for me).I have been thinking of something similar but haven't gotten around to it. Similar in shape and size to the M5 57L tailbox, but a 2 piece that fits snugly to each side of the frame by velcro because I don't feel comfortable drilling any holes in the frame and haven't found any other type of connectors that are durable enough that won't damage it. I mocked one up out of black vinyl and I believe it would look pretty good in CF.
Build it so you can mount it to the seatI have been thinking of something similar but haven't gotten around to it. Similar in shape and size to the M5 57L tailbox, but a 2 piece that fits snugly to each side of the frame by velcro because I don't feel comfortable drilling any holes in the frame and haven't found any other type of connectors that are durable enough that won't damage it. I mocked one up out of black vinyl and I believe it would look pretty good in CF.