Road bike vs. recumbent comparison

Status
Not open for further replies.

ed72

Zen MBB Master
yes more medium slow or perhaps karate chop like depending on the speed. If you look close in the Maria climbing video you'll see she is actually almost tracking straight along the fog line not zig zagging. She zig zags when cars are approaching from both ways which is something most of us will do when climbing hard and see danger coming. That is entirely different.

I think many are not familiar with the steepness of those climbs in the Appalachian mountains. She is holding a great line. I know I can't do that.
 

Osiris

Zen MBB Master
On the other hand, he might simply be not too stable on Vendetta and swinging the boom too hard leads to overcorrections due to flop and steering inertia! I haven't thought about that, and it explains his 'all over the road' comment really well!
Since my boom is much shorter, I have zero flop and much more trail force, I can swing the boom with much greater speed and force and retain enough control over the process.
Much more experienced Vendetta riders can use the dreaded leg steering (that I cannot manage) for those purposes.

All in all, Osiris, I'm sorry, but the problem *so far* indeed seems to be lack of technique on your part, and I've listed exact reasons why. Yea, my bent is better for that indeed, but given enough experience I bet you would manage that as well - you'll have to swing the boom harder and faster to get a 'statistically measurable' effect.
I've described what numbers what you should look for. Since you have a stronger upper body than I do (not hard to, really), once you'll get comfortable with MBB platform enough I bet you'll see some benefit - which is not HUGE, definitely not hundreds, but tens of watts to be sure.

Let me try this one last time. If you want to avoid weaving all over the road, you will have to pull/push the handlebars in such a way that it doesn't result in an imbalance between the steering force generated by pulling the handlebars to one side and the steering force generated by pushing on the pedals. Your advice to just "swing the boom harder" completely ignores this point. You can't swing the boom harder without also pushing harder against the pedals. If you are already pedaling as hard as you can, swinging the boom harder results in nothing more than a front end weave, just as you described above.
 

Osiris

Zen MBB Master
On another note, I've been riding my DF quite a bit recently which has produced some interesting data. My previous impression was that the reason I can generate much more power on the DF than I can on any of my recumbents is largely due to the fact that I can spin the pedals so much faster on a DF. However, a comment from Rojoracing got me curious, so when climbing a familiar segment last weekend, I deliberately kept my cadence down to ~95 rpm, which is about the fastest I can spin up that segment on my V20. The reduction in cadence did reduce my power output, but not enough to erase the big difference in power production between my DF and V20. Clearly I can still produce significantly more power on the DF than on the V20, even at the same cadence. Comparing the V20 to my CA2 and M5 shows approximately the same difference, so it remains a mystery why this is the case.
 

ed72

Zen MBB Master
Cycle exercise in the erect position is associated with an increase in exercise capacity compared with supine exercise but with no associated changes in ventilatory response to carbon dioxide production

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10527315

he dynamics of ventilation (VE), oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), and heart rate (fc) were studied in 12 healthy young men during upright and supine exercise. Responses to maximal and to two different types of submaximal exercise tests were contrasted. During incremental exercise to exhaustion, the maximal work rate, VO2max, VEmax, fc,max, and ventilatory threshold were all significantly reduced in supine compared to upright exercise (P less than 0.01-0.001).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1761025

The following study compared oxygen uptake, HR, and CO2 for upright and supine positions while cycling. Higher VO2 and HR in the upright. The CO2 levels in supine seem to be counter intuitive or paradoxical but the partial pressures are low and might be a factor (perfusion issue).

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjpta/1/1/1_1_13/_pdf

The sympathetic response to CO2 levels is too much detail.

I can't find the study now but younger (under age 44 on average) have less of a CO2 perfusion issue and have much less of a power "loss" in the supine vs. upright position.
 

Osiris

Zen MBB Master
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10527315



https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1761025

The following study compared oxygen uptake, HR, and CO2 for upright and supine positions while cycling. Higher VO2 and HR in the upright. The CO2 levels in supine seem to be counter intuitive or paradoxical but the partial pressures are low and might be a factor (perfusion issue).

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jjpta/1/1/1_1_13/_pdf

The sympathetic response to CO2 levels is too much detail.

I can't find the study now but younger (under age 44 on average) have less of a CO2 perfusion issue and have much less of a power "loss" in the supine vs. upright position.

I'll read these tonight when I have more time, but from your comments it sounds like the explanation has to do with cardio and oxygen intake efficiency. But if that's the case, why do enormous disparities in power production show up even in 10 second sprints?
 

ed72

Zen MBB Master
I'll read these tonight when I have more time, but from your comments it sounds like the explanation has to do with cardio and oxygen intake efficiency. But if that's the case, why do enormous disparities in power production show up even in 10 second sprints?

the seat angle of the recumbent lowrider (155 degrees, photo 2) are not optimal for maximal power.
According to these measurements the racing upright cyclist can generate considerably more power (mountain upwards or at a sprint), than sitting on the seat.

Note: 155 degrees is not so low.......one can extrapolate the curve to estimate what a 15-20 degree seat would cause.......
http://members.home.nl/vd.kraats/recumbent/pedal.html#Total muscle strength

https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/viewFile/1788/1661
 

ed72

Zen MBB Master
As an N=1 data point, my peak power (1-5 seconds) on an upright was 1200-1300 watts, my 5 minute power was 340-380 watts, and FTP 265-285 watts depending on fitness and season. HR during time trials 168-171.

When I first got onto a bent 15 months ago, my peak power was in the horribly anemic 500 watt range, 5 minute power around 200-230 watts, and FTP about 150-160 watts. Much much lower. I could not ride with HR over 120-125 without going into oxygen debt and lactate pain. (I got PP into the low 600 watts before undertaking some very specific training to rectify)

Now my peak power on a bent is just shy of 1000 watts, 5 minute power 320, and FTP is 260 watts in round numbers. So, let's call it 10-15% lower but still working on it. In practical terms, I have set personal all time bests on certain climbs. Once I lose the fat, I suspect all my old upright Personal Bests will fall.

In terms of aerobic cycling efforts (say FTP and below), cardiovascular in general and perfusion in particular are to blame for my improvements and I am not done, yet. I also believe older cyclists adapt to the change in position much slower than younger cyclists. I don't think I have read of an upright cyclist jumping onto a recumbent and making the same measured power and few who can demonstrate that they adapted to a recumbent (youngsters Turner and Perez come to mind) to the extent that they make the same power on a bent as on an upright. I plan to peak twice next year and expect my bent power numbers to get close, very close to my upright numbers. This will mean that it took me two full years to adapt and I do believe bent legs is really a bent lung adaptation issue, not leg muscles.

Just an N = 1 data point. real numbers.
 

Osiris

Zen MBB Master
As an N=1 data point, my peak power (1-5 seconds) on an upright was 1200-1300 watts, my 5 minute power was 340-380 watts, and FTP 265-285 watts depending on fitness and season. HR during time trials 168-171.

When I first got onto a bent 15 months ago, my peak power was in the horribly anemic 500 watt range, 5 minute power around 200-230 watts, and FTP about 150-160 watts. Much much lower. I could not ride with HR over 120-125 without going into oxygen debt and lactate pain. (I got PP into the low 600 watts before undertaking some very specific training to rectify)

My introduction to bents was much the same. The first thing I noticed, once I learned to ride the M5 competently, was that my peak power was a jaw dropping 400 watts less than it had been on my DF. It took nearly a year of riding the M5 exclusively before my peak power numbers had improved significantly, although they never got close to the ~ 1300 watts I could produce on a DF. My best was somewhere in the neighborhood of 1150 watts in a short uphill sprint, and I had to pedal at a furious pace to manage that.

In terms of aerobic cycling efforts (say FTP and below), cardiovascular in general and perfusion in particular are to blame for my improvements and I am not done, yet. I also believe older cyclists adapt to the change in position much slower than younger cyclists. I don't think I have read of an upright cyclist jumping onto a recumbent and making the same measured power and few who can demonstrate that they adapted to a recumbent (youngsters Turner and Perez come to mind) to the extent that they make the same power on a bent as on an upright. I plan to peak twice next year and expect my bent power numbers to get close, very close to my upright numbers. This will mean that it took me two full years to adapt and I do believe bent legs is really a bent lung adaptation issue, not leg muscles.

What do you think the effects of age are with respect to anaerobic power? Aside from the few sprints I do on each ride, I've never done any real training. I assumed that being in my late 50's, there wasn't much to hope for, but having seen what even older riders like Kent Polk and John Schlitter can do, I may need to reconsider.
 

ed72

Zen MBB Master
Lower anaerobic power on a bent is probably the mechanics of the angles in the legs to the hip but I do not know......

I have not done much research because my interest is in ultra endurance and randonneuring where sprinting is not much of a benefit and training those energy systems would be counterproductive in general to my objectives.

Some weightlifter friends can't do the same weight and/or reps as when younger, so, i suspect similar reasons as why PP on a bent or other bike is lower as we age. I know I used to be able to fly a golf ball over 320 yards in the air but.......getting old ain't fun. Somehow the fast twitch muscles aren't so fast anymore.
 

Balor

Zen MBB Master
Well, I'm 36, was actually 32 when I got into bents. Not a 'strapping young lad', but about close.
Still my experience very closely mimic yours - including estimated FTP and peak/5 minute power (tested on Wattbike/Tacx Neo).
My problem, however, is that BB higher than about 4 inches than the seat gives me foot numbness, and that is actually nerve damage (fortunately, reversible) due to hypoxia. What OTHER systems down below get starved of oxygen and get flooded with CO2? Like, *muscles*?
Ed, what's your knowledge of vascular resistance factors?
 

Balor

Zen MBB Master
What do you think the effects of age are with respect to anaerobic power? Aside from the few sprints I do on each ride, I've never done any real training. I assumed that being in my late 50's, there wasn't much to hope for, but having seen what even older riders like Kent Polk and John Schlitter can do, I may need to reconsider.

There is some very interesting data that suggest that simply doing a sprint or two *to exhaustion* is actually quite enough for massive benefits.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153194
 

trplay

Zen MBB Master
And there you have it. During the time you guys have spent in the last hour playing paper racer you could have shown us those good ol day 1300 watts in the Chop. Great race today. Our group didn't win but were awesome as a team. A good group of women participated today (4-5?). Maybe thats why it went so well. If we keep it up like this a win isn't far away. See you next race. Well probably not :( but everyone is invited.
 

Balor

Zen MBB Master
Let me try this one last time. If you want to avoid weaving all over the road, you will have to pull/push the handlebars in such a way that it doesn't result in an imbalance between the steering force generated by pulling the handlebars to one side and the steering force generated by pushing on the pedals. Your advice to just "swing the boom harder" completely ignores this point.

What you describe is technique for keeping the boom completely straight. If you want to contribute power, you must swing the boom much harder than simply compensating for pedal feedback (by the way, my calculations above ignore that force... so total upper body power output would be lower).
Point is, to prevent overcorrection you must stop the boom from swinging *too much*. That implies dealing with steering intertia and wheel flop - *real* "bane" of MBB bikes. There were some (and very vocal) people that could not manage even *riding* MBB bikes without complicating factors like 'boom swinging'. Those are very real problems and this is not an easy skill unless you have very good kinaestetics or 'cheat' like I did :).
Even Rojo, that can 'ride anything on two wheels' claimed 'holding for dear life' when he did his first high speed DHs on Vendetta, and the higher the speed - to more control you must have over the bars, do read the Petterson's article I've linked if you didn't already.

Can you easily ride one-handed? Can you ride no-handed at least a bit? Do you feel totally at control at high speed (40+ mph) DHs?
 

ed72

Zen MBB Master
And there you have it. During the time you guys have spent in the last hour playing paper racer you could have shown us those good ol day 1300 watts in the Chop. Great race today. Our group didn't win but were awesome as a team. A good group of women participated today (4-5?). Maybe thats why it went so well. If we keep it up like this a win isn't far away. See you next race. Well probably not :( but everyone is invited.

I just got back from a 2 hour 45 mile ride.....a real one. :)
 

ed72

Zen MBB Master
Well, I'm 36, was actually 32 when I got into bents. Not a 'strapping young lad', but about close.
Still my experience very closely mimic yours - including estimated FTP and peak/5 minute power (tested on Wattbike/Tacx Neo).
My problem, however, is that BB higher than about 4 inches than the seat gives me foot numbness, and that is actually nerve damage (fortunately, reversible) due to hypoxia. What OTHER systems down below get starved of oxygen and get flooded with CO2? Like, *muscles*?
Ed, what's your knowledge of vascular resistance factors?

Not. I'm in the same boat. Numb toes. Never had this problem on uprights. My numbness is not as bad as when I first started. On a more positive note, GIRD and frequent urination are getting better.
 

trplay

Zen MBB Master
I just got back from a 2 hour 45 mile ride.....a real one. :)

Been doing those since 1960. Really over rated IYAM. Todays race could have used more Cruzbikers in the hunt. Not only is it a hoot, it will give you a little extra pep when going back outdoors. Even more extra pep than the push - pull.
 

ed72

Zen MBB Master
Been doing those since 1960. Really over rated IYAM. Todays race could have used more Cruzbikers in the hunt. Not only is it a hoot, it will give you a little extra pep when going back outdoors. Even more extra pep than the push - pull.

Well, recovery rides are needed plus I am tapering for a 12h race coming up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top