2022 Vendetta V20c with carbon fiber front end

Henri

scatter brain
Exact position depends on the angle of leg thrust and chain, which on a Cruzbike (looking at just one model) depends on how the position of the BB and maybe crank length and leg proportions, but it depends also on the riders pedaling style and in what part of the motion they produce the most force and torque.
The position @Randyc3 shows in his photos look a bit as if the position was more fitting to a typical recumbent with the chain running more horizontally onto the chainwheel, but it would also work, if his strongest point was very early in the "power stroke", a position that on an upright roadbike would maybe be around 1-2 o'clock. But it's hard to tell from a picture if just the BB, as we can't really see his body position, like where his hip is and his legs come from, so the direktion of force onto the pedal.

But I think all this merits a dedicated thread for non-round chainrings and I would bet, there is already at least one where all of this is probably already laid out.
 

chicorider

Zen MBB Master
Exact position depends on the angle of leg thrust and chain, which on a Cruzbike (looking at just one model) depends on how the position of the BB and maybe crank length and leg proportions, but it depends also on the riders pedaling style and in what part of the motion they produce the most force and torque.
The position @Randyc3 shows in his photos look a bit as if the position was more fitting to a typical recumbent with the chain running more horizontally onto the chainwheel, but it would also work, if his strongest point was very early in the "power stroke", a position that on an upright roadbike would maybe be around 1-2 o'clock. But it's hard to tell from a picture if just the BB, as we can't really see his body position, like where his hip is and his legs come from, so the direktion of force onto the pedal.

But I think all this merits a dedicated thread for non-round chainrings and I would bet, there is already at least one where all of this is probably already laid out.
So true about there being previous discussions (this forum runs deep). I just searched "oval chainrings" and came up with four pages of threads. Easily a whole day of rabbit-hole spelunking for those who are up for it.
 

DavidCH

In thought; expanding the paradigm of traversity
If you have short cranks 255mm or under, oval looses the benefit, you would be better off with the clasic ring. I don't like mashing the pedals, I prefer the pedalling stroke to be in unity.
 

ratz

Wielder of the Rubber Mallet
So true about there being previous discussions (this forum runs deep). I just searched "oval chainrings" and came up with four pages of threads. Easily a whole day of rabbit-hole spelunking for those who are up for it.
Oh yeah, we beat that topic to death. Orientation lets you decide if you want to carry the freight with your muscles or your heart and lungs. We pretty much covered both topics. Hopefully, all the photos survived the various forum upgrades which is not always the case. Prime discussions should be in the time range 2018-2019 and around the time of the RAAM team as 3 our of 4 of them rode Ovals and we had to time rings for each riders body size. ((Never did use those 62T front rings though)). Best discussion was probably this one: https://forum.cruzbike.com/threads/q-ring-upgrade-ahhhhhhhhhhhhh.7784/ but there is another one out there with even more technical testing
 
Last edited:
Top