reading the tea leaves

igolfat8

Member
Hi Eric,Yes, your reply does

Hi Eric,

Yes, your reply does help and thank you for your well thought out and written comments. We (my wife and I) actually paid $1495 each for our 2 clubs during a winter sale about three years ago so that was the price point I was comparing to. I sure would like to demo ride one. That would likely make up my mind and push me one way or the other.



Gromit,
"Don't discount the Quest 559. Its a great bike too. I own one."

I have considered the other two lower price point Cruzbikes. However, the weight of these I think pushes 32-34 lbs? Perhaps I am thinking too much like a weight weeny but that kind of weight discourages me. Granted I am NOT a racer or a speed demon but weight is a factor that I consider when making a purchase.

Slightly off topic but , does the suspension on the Silvio take any pedaling / power transfer efficiency away as compared to the non suspended Vendetta?
 

igolfat8

Member
Thanks for your reply Blair.

Thanks for your reply Blair. Its good to read a comparison from someone who rides both.
 

richa

Active Member
Another in agreement with Shahmatt

I agree with everything Shahmatt stated as well. You've got some great products, but the website doesn't really show or explain them well.
 

Kungfuguy

Member
Since we're voicing our

Since we're voicing our opinions here, I also agree with Shahmatt. The presentation of the bikes is poor. Until Ivan posted pics of his silvio2 I didn't know there was an update. Going to the forums or even 3rd party sites for more info isn't ideal and a real turn off. Info needs to be clear and succinct. Buying components separately for the vendetta and silvio isn't the best buying experience. Some prefer one stop shop. Some may want to pick and choose components. A base model silvio should be a complete bike. Also, IMHO no bike should be painted black.

As someone who's still undecided about buying, I want a bent that is comparable to a road bike. Meaning I can join group rides (not peleton) Dual 700c or 700c/405. The silvio is really beyond my budget. Even with the means, I can't justify the price. The Quest and Softrider don't interest me.
 

Ivan

Guru
Where is the "LIKE" button to

Where is the "LIKE" button to bladderhead's suggestion on sending me a Vendetta?
regular_smile.gif


Jeremy, the many detailed shots are cos the Silvio 2 is so darn beautiful with so many lines to explore!! After a few wide shots one finishes all one needs to see.

Tim, the Silvio 2's suspension does not take away efficiency from the drivetrain. Many have commented so. You can feel the acceleration is really fast. When I researched bents people would say about typical bents that you accelerate slowly and off traffic lights you can't catch up with DF's cos they stand on their pedals and zip away at lights. This does not happen to you on a Silvio - the acceleration and efficiency is superb.

Silvio is a high performance dual suspension road bike. Similar to a frameset of any DF roadbike, all you have to add is the component groupset, wheels, and pedals. The Silvio of course includes the seat and the handlebars, which a DF frameset does not. A very good (but not top of the line) DF frameset costs around $1500-2000 -- for example the Cervelo S2 is $2000, cos that's what I rode before. So I think the Silvio's frameset price with seat, headrest, and handlebars is well justified.
 

1happyreader

zen/child method
pm sent 3/16/2014

heh Kungfuguy,

thought I would transmit in the clear this time:

I want a bent that is comparable to a road bike.

What would you pay for a "road bike " ??

It's been a while since I shopped around for a recumbent , but I remember being daunted by the prices of the P38 lighting, tour Easy, and the Rans stable.

Have you shopped used bikes ???? maybe 50 - 75% of new value ??

Low volume manufacturers will never be able to compete with the prices charged by large volume bso (Bike Shaped Objects) makers.

So what is your Price point ?????
 

Kungfuguy

Member
Happyrider
My budget is


Happyrider

My budget is $2000. For that price, I could get a very good carbon DF. There was a used Silvio1 for $1700. It didn't interest me. I hate to think that bents are a rich man's club. Granted selling to the rich is good business.

Years ago, there was a sea change in the bike market when MTB outsold road bikes. Which manufacturer is going to stick their neck out to push bents as the next sea change? When that happens, everyone benefits.
 

Charles.Plager

Recumbent Quant
Hi Kungfuguy,
Just to


Hi Kungfuguy,

Just to reiterate what Bob and the others have said, it's unfortunately really easy. It's just economy of scale.

If you can crank out 10,000 units, you can get much cheaper prices than if you are making 100 (or less) at a time.

If you think you want to try a recumbent and can't/won't afford a Silvio or even a Sofrider, find a (used) Cruzbike conversion kit. You'll be able to get out what you put into it (dual 700 wheels or suspended, or folding bike or...).

Cheers,
Charles
 

ratz

Wielder of the Rubber Mallet
It's a void not a pricing error.

Kungfuguy,

What you feeling is a void in the line up; not an over pricing of the Silvio. You are correct about the void, but not about the Silivio being too expensive. Hopefully I can make that case to you without being insulting..... If I fail please assume I trying; because I think others might share you conclusion. I fail blame the internet.
shades_smile.gif


Apple computers had this problem for years and always got beat up about it. Simply put when you compete against a broad spectrum of products in multiple classes at multiple levels of function; there are going to be gaps in your product line card. That's business and that's life with limited resources especially for a startup company.

The Quest competes with a solid commuter bike; and the folder market. The softrider competes with the $900 "giant" brand cross bike you buy either for your 16 - 18 year old because you are bike snob and you won't let them ride crap, or because you are a casual biker who can afford "nice". They are priced correctly, and I can see why they completely don't interest you.

The Silvio competes head on with the $5-9k bikes; and the V is going up against $6-12k bikes. I've ridden so called high end bikes for 30+ years and I have a good feel for how the Silvio compares and I'm very confident in my assessment. My last road bike cost $8k in 2003 and by todays standard would be $11k. My Silvio which, I am still learning to ride, is already more comfortable and is as fast or faster, after I've acclimated I'll have a winner for the dollar spent.

Now in my experience People buy an expensive carbon bike so that they can go fast and be comfortable, or to fit in with the crowd by doing what is expected. We'll discount those that buy to "fit in" as irrelevant to this discussion since buying a recumbent isn't "fitting in". We can hope, but that's not today's market.

Comparing bikes in the "very good" quality range..... I can get a fully setup Silvio on the road for $2700 if I wanted to and it's still going to be a better ride than: a Trek Domane , a Focus Cayo Evo 4.0, a Storck Scenero G2, or a Boardman SLR. If you don't know those bikes by name, they where all in the running for bike of the year last year and have prices ranging from $2350-3150 with 105 class components and what I would classify as basic (aka slow) wheels. When you drop out of that price range build quality is going to be less; ride quality is going to be less, and you are going to get "suspect" parts.

It's always going to be a function of "good, fast, cheap" pick two.

So back to the void, there is no bike in the Cruzbike line up that's competing with a Carbon DF from Bikes direct; there simply isn't a back stock of 2010 models sitting in a warehouse that have to be sold at a loss so you don't have to warehouse them any longer. If you want to compete at the sub $2k price point then you pretty much need to get the v2k frame and the kit; and start building.

So the question that was at the heart of this wonderfully open thread was is Cruzbike spending their time developing the right bikes. Some of use have said "heck yeah build the high end and advance the bread". I take you as to be saying "whoa dudes you're like 10 years ahead, stop and fill in the gaps".
wink_smile.gif
Ok both have their merits; we don't know what they will do next. I applaud them having this discussion, but it's tea leave man, just tea leaves.

What I do know that is far more certain, IF you want a cool fast Cruzbike for $2k; there are a bunch of people here that would find it fun to start another thread about how to build a wicked cool v2k build; with fast tires; cheap 105 class component or microshift; and a boom like steering system instead of the vertical pipe that the conversion kit pushes us toward. That's on my summer project list. If we did a good job they might start offering that as a standard kit in the store. Now if we just had a really nice carbon/aluminum hybrid fork for such a project... hmmmm.

Anyways you keep pushing for that 2k equivalent bike; i'll keep hoping for the zockra killer carbon Vendetta and we'll see where John and company go, as long as they stay in business and keep making bikes, it will be a good direction.

Oh an I'm serious about the 2k build anyone that wants to co-design/solve that problem with me; my 10 year son is really itching for me to get started on that project....

-Bob

 

Ian Smith

Member
Another take on it

From another angle; DF manufacturers have the advantage that they've dominated the playing field for a long time. The lower end bikes are often produced by one manufacturer and then branded by many. Case in point is the low end bikes from Azzuri, Avanti and Orbea. Here is one way to get around the cost of manufacturing and a few tips from a commuter.

* Get rid of the Quest. Not many people like orange as a colour, it's too 'ugly', too 'different' and it is impractical when you are commuting because it's tough to fit a standard rack and pannier system. The twist grip gear change is a detractor for most cyclists new to the bike, as is the upright steerer and the funny looking trailing arm. As a design piece I'm sure it's considered beautiful in novelty value only.

* Add a list of recommended racks to your website so that it is easy for your clientele to know what will fit their bikes. Check out the latest Azub 6 review on BROL to see how one maker has addressed load carrying solutions.

* Replace the bottom-ish end of the group with a modified earlier version of the Silvio. Take the V1.5, remove the front suspension, replace the rear suspension with a standard MTB shock setup, air bladder, or complete rear triangle from a standard light alloy (or carbon) MB already on the market (I'm sure Giant or one of those would be willing to share) and utilise things like standard Shimano wheelset and 105 components. Try to make this bike fit the $1000 - $2000 bracket. Choose a colour scheme more alluring to that market with some white, silver, blue types of schemes. Update the logo on this bike to something funky looking. 'models' can be changed by slight variations in the components and colour schemes, just like the larger companies do.

* Update the seat to something with a bit more ventilation on the lower end models. You may find that this makes the seat cheaper too. There's nothing worse than getting to your destination with a big sweat strip up the back of your work shirt. I must admit, this is a big turn off for Cruzbike for me.

* The last point is all about marketing. With a new product, if people can't try it, people won't buy it. More importantly, if people don't know about it, people won't buy it. Currently the bike is ridden by 'alternative enthusiasts' and not even known by the mainstream. This may be as simple as selling your soul and getting the bike into more independent bike shops.
 

Kungfuguy

Member
Just to add to Ian's

Just to add to Ian's post.
Recumbent manufacturers tend to take for granted that bents are unique enough to forgo some basic but necessary branding and aesthetics. The logo has to be redesigned. All DF have huge logos in bold lettering. You can't mistake it. The Silvio2 logo is nice, but that's not the company name. Graphics make the bent pop out. Aside from the paint, these graphics give the bent good lines. They are all on the DF bikes. Bents cost many thousands, I'm a bit surprised graphics aren't given much thought. These things sound trivial and may add to the cost of a bent.
 

scabinetguy

Well-Known Member
Vendetta or Silvio

A good comparison of Silvio 2.0 and the Vendetta. The Silvio has a 58mm extension and Vendetta handle bars. The Vendetta has no modifications. Very similar position and very similar rides. The Vendetta is probably faster but I only notice a difference at speeds above 22mph.....Tough choice.
 

Jeremy S

Dude
Hi Steve, which model

Hi Steve, which model Vendetta is that? I think the geometry has changed on the most recent model.
 

billyk

Guru
do NOT get rid of the Quest

I've read this thread with interest, but never having seen, much less ridden, either a Silvio or a Vendetta, I haven't had anything to contribute. But having recently turned past 4000 miles (that'd be well over 6000km) in my Quest 2, I have to disagree vehemently with Ian Smith's "get rid of the Quest" comment above. Yes, it's heavier, obviously. (But so am I.) And as a commuter, I'm using it to carry several pounds of lunch, laptop, books and files, tools, groceries, you name it.

For urban riding, mixing it up with traffic and people, the Q has one big advantage over the S or V: sitting more upright, you can see the ground much closer in front of you (I am judging this by photos of the bikes, obviously). Recumbents inherently give less visibility in the near-forward, with your knees up there in the field of view, but the Q minimizes this problem. I don't know about where you ride, but here in Seattle the roads are full of potholes, deep cracks and obstacles of all kinds. Dogs, puddles, children running, ... the ability to see the ground up close in front is huge.

And as I've written here before, it's a great climber, better than any of the recumbents I've ridden in this hilly city for 20 years. When I need to put on power, the thing just jumps ahead, even uphill.

So while the Quest is not going to appeal to the wanna-be racer, it fills a very definite and useful niche. And I beg to disagree about the color! It's gorgeous! Keep making them!

But I was not tempted by the Q3 because - for the above reasons - the front suspension is really needed here.

BK
 

KiwiGuy

Well-Known Member
Think like a Marketing Manager

John asked us to think like the Cruzbike Marketing Manager.

Here's the issue. Just because something is a great bike (as I have no doubt the Quest is), doesn't mean it should be part of the Cruzbike range.

The first question to ask is, "What is a Cruzbike?"

The question is answered by what Marketing Managers call a USP (Unique Selling Proposition) or SMP (Single Minded Proposition).

Cruzbike used to have all sorts of messages on this site about comfort and fun. But those messages where generic to recumbents. They were not unique to Cruzbike. They now have a USP on their home page which positions Cruzbikes as "Recumbents that climb fast". Brilliant positioning (poorly displayed and inadequately highlighted; with insufficient evidence on the site that this positioning is believable - but that's another issue). The major issue with recumbents is that they have a reputation as poor climbers. No other recumbent brand has taken this high ground like Cruzbike. It is unique and extremely single-minded.

BTW. A combination of an emphasis on John's patent combined with numerous owner/rider stories of how their Cruzbike easily out-climbs their previous recumbent/df would provide the evidence needed for this positioning.

So if that is the Cruzbike positioning (Recumbents that climb fast), all Cruzbike models must meet that criteria. They must climb fast. I don't have experience with the Quest, but based on owner experience I've read it appears to be slower on climbs than the Silvio or Vendetta. Conclusion - it shouldn't be part of the Cruzbike brand. Brutal? Yes. But it needs to be eliminated for Cruzbike's positioning to be credible.

What to do with the Quest? As billlyK says, it fills a very definite and useful niche. Easy - start another brand focused around utility bikes (I can't think of a USP off the top of my head). License the Cruzbike patent to the new brand. Lot's of options for names. Off the top of my head, I'd call this utility bike brand "County" and position the "Quest" as the top tier bike in the range. I'd have a mid-tier bike called "Roadster" and maybe a bottom tier bike called "Porter".

This way the Cruzbike shareholders can have their cake and eat it too. Cruzbike would be the 'performance' brand and "County' (or whatever) would be the 'utility' brand.

Of course this sort of approach requires great focus and discipline, so it's not for everyone. But the Cruzbike team have shown themselves to be incredibly inventive, persistent, courageous and willing to do what they believe in. All good signs that they will continue to make smart marketing moves.

Kind regards...
 

ak-tux

Zen MBB Master
Silvio 2 and Vendetta

Wow ?@scabinetguy, your position on your two bikes are almost identical!

When I superimpose your two pictures, the Silvio places your head slightly higher, about 1.5" to 2" by my estimation. That may explain the difference in speeds above 22mph (approx 35Kph), in addition to probably the turbulence created at the chain-stay/chain-stay extension area. This is based on my assumption that being flat/rectangular as compared to the round chain-stays of the Vendetta increases their drag coefficient (Cdr). Offcourse the rectangular shapes allows the suspension to flex vertically while with no lateral/horizontal flex.

Forgive my manipulation of your photos below:
Silvio-Vendetta-Overlay.JPG
 

Nanda Holz

Active Member
Fix the seat first!

I've lost close to a half dozen serious Silvio buyers because of the crudeness and discomfort of the seat. Adopting the Novosport hardshell would complete the package on both bikes, and give another profit center to dealers by enabling them to offer Radical bag accessories, tail boxes, functional rattle free headrests etc. Using a standardized recumbent seat design, with a mature accessory suite, should be a no brainer for any recumbent company that is looking long term.

With regards to pricing, I would put them out at $2,500 for both models and let the market play out. I would offer the previous Silvio 1.5 with the higher seat and and welded frame at the $2,190 price, or work out an adjustable angle solution the spanned the 1.5-2.1 seat angles. The $2,500 price point would be justified on a Silvio 2.2 with a adjustable angle fiberglass seat and Ventisit cushion, with a carbon seat option at +$250.

Just had this exact discussion yesterday with Larry in TX :)
 

ratz

Wielder of the Rubber Mallet
I don't normally do this....

  • +1 To everything Nanda just said about The Seat.
  • +1 To making the Silvio the base platform for the high-end three models. (Follow what TroyTec has done with that idea.)
  • +1 To Fixing the graphics (Improved Cruzbike logo goes where the Silvio 2.0 logo is. Model specific logo goes on the swappable tail Triangle) Mrs Ratz's company is willing to help re-design the graphics for free that's how much the current one bothers her....
  • +1 To everything Nanda just said about the Seat
  • +5 To the secret unannounced idea to make an all new Vendetta Generation 3 race bike, to chase all the ideas Eric was outlining. The next generation of the S frame needs to come from a clean slate that takes a fresh look at any and all short comings of the current platform with cockpit being the focus. Small audience huge rewards for the future of the bike. Spend two year getting that right; the redo the Silvio 3 models based on what you learn.
  • +1 To getting the older Silvio tech back into the line up; the gen 1.5 tech still has massive merit and could migrate downward to re-vitalize the Softrider line, and could mature the v2k in to an entry level bike for those that want an honest <$1500 solution.
  • +1 to everything Nanda just said about the Seat.
  • Price it so it's cheaper to buy from a dealer every time
  • Get a review unit to Bentrider some how; having a 3rd party review matters.




 

Charles.Plager

Recumbent Quant
And just to be

And just to be clear:

Whatever you do, don't drop the conversion kit. Seriously, just don't do it. There will always be people who can't afford even $1200 for the Sofrider and others who just aren't sold on the MBB concept (it 'tis a little weird).

So, in summary, don't drop the conversion kit.


tl;dr: keep conversion kit.

:D

Charles

p.s. I'll point out that I have asked for a carbon fiber Vendetta before. Not a bad idea at all. :D
 

ratz

Wielder of the Rubber Mallet
what charles means

What Charles is really trying to say is, the conversion kit or the V2k needs a FORK....
regular_smile.gif
and poof conversion kits sell at 2x the current rate.
 
Top