N.B.: I'm yet to try a 'real' damper myself, so take my advice on the 'DAMPER' side at face value - theorizing.
Jason is right, too: if you don't have trouble with damping the steering inertia, damper will only make things worse. But if you *do*, it is certainly going to make a difference!
However, when it comes to steering inertia, MBB designs are much closer to motocycles (and it may even be greater, depends on the weight of your legs
), so adding a moto damper seems like a warranted addition.
I should note that MBB varibike has moto steering damper factory installed:
http://newatlas.com/varibike-trike-arm-leg-powered/48031/
Whether this is 'great mind thinking alike' or 'crazy minds thinking alike' is up to you
I guess it greatly depends how you can finely coordinate movements of your arms and legs to control the bike - while legs are not 'dead weight', unless you are actively doing something steering-related with them, they might as well be as far as steering purposes are concerned.
For the 'flop stop' side, it an extremely welcome addition for a number of reasons.
Read this paper, this is really fascinating stuff:
http://www.bicycle.tudelft.nl/ProceedingsBMD2010/papers/patterson2010application.pdf
It is centered around a concept what Patterson calls a 'control spring' - a self-centring force that is vital for a bike to be pleasant to ride (or rideable at all).
"I used several bikes and riders to confirm our findings. This allowed me to determine that the spring constant that fit the subjective feel of many people is 1500 newtons per meter. The mystery spring constant worked as a useable bike design tool for several years. We have since discovered that the USAF uses an optimal spring constant for the F-15 fighter of 7.5 lb/inch, which is approximately 1400 new-tons/meter"
If you read this article, you'll see that this force is composed of two counteracting forces:
a. Wheel flop - that degrades the steering by making the wheel flop into the turn.
b. Trail force - that provides that most welcome 'self-centering' action.
Unfortunately, on MBB wheel flop is very strong due to basically being 'two-fold':
1. Wheel flop force (a "conventional wheel flop" that is actually head tube lowering as you turn the wheel, it's force depends on how much weight is on the front wheel, steering angle and trail.)
2. Front triangle weight - the 'directly observed' wheel flop that makes the fork flop under it's own weight due to CG of the steering being above the steering axis - hence it 'wants' to return to stable equilibrium - flop over. It gets worse with your legs added on top of it.
I've communicated with Patterson, he advises like 12cm of trail for MBB. Unfortunately, that makes (1) flop stronger, and low-speed behaviour would be very bad until you pick up the speed and trail forces overcome that wheel flop forces... and at very high speed this much trail would actually make steering corrections hard to perform.
Also I should note that trail force depends on traction, and traction is a limited and highly contested (steering and driving) resource on MBB! Plus, since trail force is due to friction of the tire against the pavement, lots of trails would make you slower. Not by much to be sure, but still!
So, barring exotic designs like negative angle steering (which I'm working on atm, nearly ready but it does have it's limitations), adding a pretty strong spring to counteract this 'two-fold' wheel flop would result in a bike that is much better to handle at all speeds, AND independent on front wheel traction AND would make you faster compared to lots of trail.
Sounds like a no-brainer to me.